|
1. Windows-based MUD server
|
|
Thu Aug 21, 2003 [9:32 AM]
|
divaexpat
kai1xin1@hotmail.com
member since: Jun 19, 2003
|
Reply
|
|
Okay... so I'm still researching servers for my figure skating MUD, and I was just wondering... why are there so few windows-based servers, and what are the cons of using one ?
|
|
|
|
|
2. RE: Windows-based MUD server
|
|
Thu Aug 21, 2003 [10:07 AM]
|
Tyche
Email not supplied
member since: Apr 4, 2000
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Here's an older list of muds that run on Windows... http://home.alltel.net/jlsysinc/winmud.shtml I apologize for the rest of the site being broken as it's been in transition for awhile. ;-) There are a quite a bit more out there now.
The biggest con is you'll likely end up self-hosting your mud. That is unless you wish to spend $100-$250/mo. as Windows hosts are more expensive for service providers to run.
|
|
|
|
|
3. RE: Windows-based MUD server
|
|
Fri Aug 22, 2003 [8:11 AM]
|
divaexpat
Email not supplied
member since: Jun 19, 2003
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
thanks for the link. Actually, I'm interested in windows based MUDS partly because I would be able to self-host instead of having to pay for a machine... I'm just wondering if there are any cons to windows-based MUDS. Are they supposed to be less stable or something ?
|
|
|
|
|
4. RE: Windows-based MUD server
|
|
Fri Aug 22, 2003 [9:13 AM]
|
DaShiVa
DaShiVa.LunATiC@verizon.net
member since: Aug 10, 2001
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
How well they have been coded aside, they are as stable as the server. Which means 'Yes.' They aren't nearly as stable as linux based muds.
|
|
|
|
|
5. RE: Windows-based MUD server
|
|
Fri Aug 22, 2003 [9:22 AM]
|
unifex
unifex@nospam_yuidesigns.net
member since: Dec 12, 2000
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
If you're running Windows 2000 and up, you should have no worries about general system stability. Your stability will usually be less than with a unix server, though, because when a security patch comes out you don't often have to reboot a unix server, only the affected daemon. There's also the issue of CALs for terminal services, but if you don't have many people logged into the server or if you use a free remote-access tool such as cygwin and ssh or vnc, it should be alright.
Yui Unifex
|
|
|
Yui Unifex
|
|