Pages: 1 | 2
|
26. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Mon Mar 2, 2009 [6:54 PM]
|
cratylus
Email not supplied
member since: Feb 1, 2006
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
Laerrus, Fri Feb 27, 2009 I will not be replying to any other posts about this
Laerrus, Mon Mar 2, 2009 Go jerk off in a corner or something
I bet you once "left mudding forever" too. -Crat http://lpmuds.net
|
|
|
|
|
27. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Mon Mar 2, 2009 [6:55 PM]
|
Keriwena
Email not supplied
member since: Jun 25, 2001
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
Also as for KaVir and Tyche's comments being "irreputable slander" they're quite likely the two members of the MUD community with the highest reputation's.
Give him a break, it was just a typo. I'm sure he meant "irrefutable". ;)
|
|
|
|
|
28. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Mon Mar 2, 2009 [8:27 PM]
|
randerson8
robert.j.anderson1984@gmail.com
member since: Feb 19, 2009
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Seriously people, I asked a question asking for help, and now you're all just bickering and slandering each other... How about we just let this post die, since my problem has now been solved...
|
|
|
|
|
29. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [3:28 AM]
|
Drizzt1216
Email not supplied
member since: Aug 12, 2005
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
Aside: who the hell plays ROM 1.0?
Missed that till just now. The answer of course is simply: 3-4 times the number of people play RoM 1.0 as have ever heard of NiMUD. Go jerk off in a corner or something, it's probably more interesting. Interesting how you continue replying to a thread which is so uninteresting.
|
|
|
|
|
30. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [3:33 AM]
|
Drizzt1216
Email not supplied
member since: Aug 12, 2005
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
Seriously people, I asked a question asking for help, and now you're all just bickering and slandering each other... Wrong. No one has posted anything even bordering on slander besides possibly Locke/Laerrus. Slandering something requires intentionally lying about it. I have not lied. Tyche has not lied. KaVir has not lied. Locke has lied, repeatedly. Locke is also delusional and may be believing his own lies, in which case he can't be slandering anything either, he can simply be delusional. How about we just let this post die, since my problem has now been solved... And how about you be happy your problem has now been solved and ignore the thread from here on out and let it end at its own pace as its path, direction, and longevity no longer affect you.
|
|
|
|
|
31. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [7:57 PM]
|
Laerrus
Email not supplied
member since: Feb 5, 2009
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
You guys are just bullies, leave me alone. You come in, your bullish cronies come with you, you pester me and insult me, then degrade me as a group. That's practically racism. I do what I do for the good of the game, and when I write it or take a break, I know I've done something interesting. I'm not a liar or a fraud, you're just a hater.
|
|
|
|
|
32. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [8:25 PM]
|
cratylus
Email not supplied
member since: Feb 1, 2006
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
"I do what I do for the good of the game" You should do what you do because you want to, not because you want people to owe you something. "That's practically racism" Srsly u guys, this could be someone trying to portray Locke in the worst light possible. -Crat http://lpmuds.net
|
|
|
|
|
33. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [8:53 PM]
|
Laerrus
Email not supplied
member since: Feb 5, 2009
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
34. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Tue Mar 3, 2009 [11:49 PM]
|
Drizzt1216
Email not supplied
member since: Aug 12, 2005
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
He defended you in the manner of he stated he did not believe you were a code thief. Neither I, nor anyone else in this thread, claimed you were a code thief. Several of us called you a liar, but not a thief.
|
|
|
|
|
35. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Wed Mar 4, 2009 [10:43 AM]
|
Laerrus
Email not supplied
member since: Feb 5, 2009
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Actually, I think you are the person who did that primarily, bully.
Anyway um, yeah so I think you did actually contend that Locke had nothing to do with the development of OLC, which would be sort of claiming he's a thief? So I guess Mr. I Live In A Glass House, this message is your response stone.
|
|
|
|
|
36. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Wed Mar 4, 2009 [10:55 AM]
|
Drizzt1216
Email not supplied
member since: Aug 12, 2005
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
Anyway um, yeah so I think you did actually contend that Locke had nothing to do with the development of OLC, which would be sort of claiming he's a thief? Don't put words in my mouth. I stated you had little to do with it and that it was primarily coded by Woodward, which, it was. Stating you claim more credit for something than I believe you deserve is not the same as calling you a code thief in any way shape or form. Also why are you speaking of Locke in third person now? It's rather odd. (Comment added by Drizzt1216 on Wed Mar 4 12:57:18 2009)Oh, and calling me a bully is cute. You're nearly twice my age yet the last time I heard anyone use the term bully as much as you do was in third grade on the playground. (Comment added by Drizzt1216 on Wed Mar 4 12:58:20 2009)Also in my eyes, by now you're bullying yourself if anything. I'm not backing you up against a brick wall during recess and taking your money, you're checking this post quite willingly even after stating you were done replying days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
37. RE: Looking for a good codebase
|
|
Wed Mar 4, 2009 [1:53 PM]
|
Hades_Kane
Email not supplied
member since: Aug 17, 2001
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
I think I've called Drizzt a bully before too :p
So what I find funny is that you are trying to insinuate there is some coalition of bullies that gang up to pick on someone.
That isn't the case.
Drizzt and I have vastly different methods of how we go about certain tasks on these forums, and the likes of Drizzt, Cratylus, Tyche, and myself disagree quite a bit, in fact, and I can honestly say there's seemed rarely a time when the group of people you are calling a group of bullies have all cohesively agreed on a single subject.
You must be something special afterall :)
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 | 2
|