|
1. Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Tue Jun 22, 2004 [10:08 PM]
|
twooutgreg
Email not supplied
member since: Jun 22, 2004
|
Reply
|
|
Are any of you familiar with using Java as a code base?
|
|
|
|
|
2. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [2:12 AM]
|
Kastagaar
Email not supplied
member since: Jul 29, 1999
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
|
|
There are two ways of constructing software: to make it so simple that there are obviously no errors, and to make it so complex that there are no obvious errors.
|
|
3. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [3:04 AM]
|
Tyche
Email not supplied
member since: Apr 4, 2000
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
No, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
|
|
|
|
|
4. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [3:31 AM]
|
fmike
Email not supplied
member since: Sep 17, 2003
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [4:05 AM]
|
guinn_uk
Email not supplied
member since: May 25, 2000
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Wow, a coding question I can answer.
No, I'm not familiar. I hear Tyche isn't either, but Kastagaar apparently is.
Glad to help
|
|
|
|
|
6. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [8:37 AM]
|
sm007h
Email not supplied
member since: Jun 6, 2004
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
So now that you can finally answer a coding question, does this mean you will hang out in the coders forum more?
|
|
|
Shaken and stirred, brain damaged as a result.
|
|
7. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [9:43 AM]
|
KrayzieK
krayziek@mchsi.com
member since: Mar 10, 2004
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
As this one guy used to say, Java is a faster way, to program a slower MUD :).
|
|
|
|
|
8. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [11:21 AM]
|
irwinr12
Email not supplied
member since: Mar 26, 2001
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Not true, Java MUDs run just as fast as muds written in C or C++. Startup time is a little slower, but at runtime there is no noticeable difference what-so-ever.
-Jeremy, who's Java MUD has an SQL backend, and still runs faster than greased lightning.
I've seen cases where Java outran C in benchmarks. The current Java runtime engines usually compile the bytecodes to native at runtime using the Just-in-Time (JiT) compiler.
|
|
|
|
|
9. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jun 23, 2004 [12:46 PM]
|
KrayzieK
krayziek@mchsi.com
member since: Mar 10, 2004
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
^^ was just kiddin' around, hence the smiley face but....
Could run 2x faster or 2x slower depending on what you are doing and how you do it. There is advantages/disadvantages to both.
|
|
|
|
|
10. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Tue Jul 6, 2004 [12:34 PM]
|
Tulath
Email not supplied
member since: Jul 6, 2004
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Heh. I believe he's referring to my beast, which runs CoffeeMUD with M$ SQL 2000 as the backend db (can't be too many Jeremy's with those running around). It does run fast and even boots up in under 3 minutes with around 40,000 rooms.
If you're wanting to get started with coding in Java for MUDs, save yourself a lot of pain and check out CoffeeMUD ( http://coffeemud.zimmers.net ). Bo was nice enough to all of us to write a detailed programmer's guide that can jumpstart even a java novice. Also, there is a great support group available with around 20 (of 200) active posters daily.
Tulath Vice President False Realities MUD http://www.falserealities.com
|
|
|
|
|
11. RE: Coding a mud with Java
|
|
Wed Jul 28, 2004 [4:07 AM]
|
guinn_uk
Email not supplied
member since: May 25, 2000
|
In Reply To
Reply
|
|
Sure, if anyone else needs my flippant replies I'll be glad to help them out. I'm good with QBasic, upto 'Hello World' standard (assuming someone helps me that is).
|
|
|
|
|